Charles V State Farm

Russell Charles v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al

Client’s Settlements:

$35,000 & $259,779.63

Case Type:

Car Accident, Worker’s Compensation

Case Duration:

March 2009 – March 2013


Share this Case:

       

 

On November 17th, 2007 Russell Charles was driving an 18-wheeler, transporting sugar cane during grinding season. A man driving a truck fell asleep at the wheel and crossed the median, hitting Charles’ 18-wheeler and causing it to jackknife. Mr Charles had a history of previous back injuries and chronic pain. This accident worsened his back problems to the point where he could no longer work and was in significant daily pain.

Mr Charles was an insured driver, and also had insurance for uninsured motorists. The man who hit him did not have insurance. When he filed for workers compensation and made an insurance claim, both insurance parties denied his claims. The insurance companies argued that his injuries were from existing health problems and could not be from the most recent accident.

The Law Offices of L. Clayton Burgess reviewed Mr. Charles’ case and found discrepancies in the insurance companies’ arguments. A vocational rehab specialist ruled Mr Charles as “unable to do any type of gainful activity for the remainder of his life.” Testimony from his doctors also showed a significant decline in his health since the accident.

Results:

Mr. Charles’ case was settled out of court once the evidence for his impairment was presented. The Law Offices of L. Clayton Burgess helped him get a $35, 000 settlement from insurance. A further $259,779.63 was awarded for worker’s compensation.

Case Pleadings and Documents
More Information
Russell Charles 20017 accident
Front view of Charles' sugar cane truck after the accident
Russell Charles 20017 accident
Charles' sugar cane truck knocked off the roadway
Russell Charles 20017 accident
Photos of the aftermath of the 2007 accident

Still have a question? Drop us a line.

Call us!

A note about settlements

Settlement amounts can be misleading. Every case is unique and has different circumstances. You can’t base expectations for your settlement on another person’s case. An attorney will perform a investigation of your case and determine expected amounts from there.